Is Michael Jordan #74 worth grading?
Basketball · Basketball Cards 1996 Topps Stars · full price guide →
Worth grading — even a PSA 9 beats raw
A PSA 10 Michael Jordan #74 sells for $263 against $5.04 raw: a $257 spread, 52× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($49.58) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $5.04
- PSA 10
- $263
- PSA 9
- $49.58
- Gem premium
- 52×
- As of
- Sep 4, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $263 | +$232 | +$207 | +$107 |
| PSA 9 | $49.58 | +$19.54 | −$5.46 | −$105 |
| PSA 8 | $28.00 | −$2.04 | −$27.04 | −$127 |
Net = sale price − $5.04 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $103 | +$47.77 |
| 50% | $156 | +$101 |
| 75% | $209 | +$154 |
Break-even gem rate at the standard fee: about 3%. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses — measure it before you decide.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $341 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $263 | −$78.50 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $158 | −$183 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $49.00 | −$292 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →Swipe the table for the other grading companies →
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 1996 Topps Stars cards worth checking
Full set checklist →
![Michael Jordan [Finest Refractor] #74 1996 Topps Stars card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/qwUAAeSwJEVosjeF/s-l500.jpg)
![Michael Jordan [Finest] #124 1996 Topps Stars card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3PMAAeSwObdqYVub/s-l500.jpg)
![Michael Jordan [Finest Refractor] #24 1996 Topps Stars card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/nWoAAeSwFLNqkaSp/s-l500.jpg)
![Michael Jordan [Finest Atomic Refractor] #74 1996 Topps Stars card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/pVQAAeSw61hqm1z1/s-l500.jpg)
Grading Michael Jordan #74 — FAQ
Is Michael Jordan #74 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Michael Jordan #74 sells for $263 against $5.04 raw: a $257 spread, 52× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($49.58) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Michael Jordan #74 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Michael Jordan #74 (Basketball Cards 1996 Topps Stars) sells for about $263 versus $5.04 for a raw near-mint copy — a 52× premium as of Sep 4, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Michael Jordan #74?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $341, ahead of PSA 10 at $263. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Michael Jordan #74 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
What gem rate makes grading Michael Jordan #74 break even?
At a standard ~$50 fee, submitting Michael Jordan #74 breaks even when it gems about 3% of the time (a miss assumed to sell at the PSA 9 price of $49.58).
Best on iPhone & Android
Check your basketball card in the Midpoint app
Scan with your camera to measure centering to the millimeter, get an AI grade with corner and edge close-ups, see what your copy is worth, and track it in your portfolio. Free to start.
