![Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 (Basketball Cards 1981 Topps) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Bz8AAOSw8Dll7iLp/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 worth grading?
Basketball · Basketball Cards 1981 Topps · full price guide →
Worth grading — even a PSA 9 beats raw
A PSA 10 Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 sells for $54.00 against $1.94 raw: a $52.06 spread, 28× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($45.00) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $1.94
- PSA 10
- $54.00
- PSA 9
- $45.00
- Gem premium
- 28×
- As of
- Sep 3, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $54.00 | +$27.06 | +$2.06 | −$97.94 |
| PSA 9 | $45.00 | +$18.06 | −$6.94 | −$107 |
| PSA 8 | $19.73 | −$7.21 | −$32.21 | −$132 |
Net = sale price − $1.94 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $47.25 | −$4.69 |
| 50% | $49.50 | −$2.44 |
| 75% | $51.75 | −$0.19 |
Break-even gem rate at the standard fee: about 77%. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses — measure it before you decide.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $70.00 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $54.00 | −$16.00 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $32.00 | −$38.00 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $32.00 | −$38.00 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →Swipe the table for the other grading companies →
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 1981 Topps cards worth checking
Full set checklist →![Charlie Criss [East] #E67 1981 Topps card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/PtwAAOSwiJ9l7iKf/s-l500.jpg)
![Magic Johnson [West] #W109 1981 Topps card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/EigAAeSwvdxqVEva/s-l500.jpg)
Grading Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 — FAQ
Is Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 sells for $54.00 against $1.94 raw: a $52.06 spread, 28× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($45.00) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 (Basketball Cards 1981 Topps) sells for about $54.00 versus $1.94 for a raw near-mint copy — a 28× premium as of Sep 3, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Mark Landsberger [West] #W78?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $70.00, ahead of PSA 10 at $54.00. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
What gem rate makes grading Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 break even?
At a standard ~$50 fee, submitting Mark Landsberger [West] #W78 breaks even when it gems about 77% of the time (a miss assumed to sell at the PSA 9 price of $45.00).
Best on iPhone & Android
Check your basketball card in the Midpoint app
Scan with your camera to measure centering to the millimeter, get an AI grade with corner and edge close-ups, see what your copy is worth, and track it in your portfolio. Free to start.
