![Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 (Baseball Cards 2022 Bowman's Best UFO) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/OwoAAeSwHjNqa7Mi/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 worth grading?
Baseball · Baseball Cards 2022 Bowman's Best UFO · full price guide →
Worth grading only if it gems
A PSA 10 Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 brings $160 versus $56.32 raw — a $104 spread that covers an economy-tier ~$25 grading fee. A PSA 9 ($30.00) sells for less than raw, so anything short of a 10 loses money.
- Raw (NM)
- $56.32
- PSA 10
- $160
- PSA 9
- $30.00
- Gem premium
- 2.8×
- As of
- Sep 4, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $160 | +$79.01 | +$54.01 | −$45.99 |
| PSA 9 | $30.00 | −$51.32 | −$76.32 | −$176 |
| PSA 8 | $28.00 | −$53.32 | −$78.32 | −$178 |
Net = sale price − $56.32 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $62.58 | −$43.74 |
| 50% | $95.17 | −$11.15 |
| 75% | $128 | +$21.43 |
Break-even gem rate at the standard fee: about 59%. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses — measure it before you decide.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $208 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $160 | −$47.67 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $96.00 | −$112 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $96.00 | −$112 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →Swipe the table for the other grading companies →
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 2022 Bowman's Best UFO cards worth checking
Full set checklist →![Elly De La Cruz [Atomic] #UFO-5 2022 Bowman's Best UFO card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/IDwAAeSw0O5qtC7X/s-l500.jpg)
![Bobby Witt Jr. [Atomic] #UFO-12 2022 Bowman's Best UFO card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/OnQAAeSwMf5qiLwR/s-l500.jpg)
![Elly De La Cruz [Lava] #UFO-5 2022 Bowman's Best UFO card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/mG4AAeSwPaJp-Iu0/s-l500.jpg)
Grading Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 — FAQ
Is Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 brings $160 versus $56.32 raw — a $104 spread that covers an economy-tier ~$25 grading fee. A PSA 9 ($30.00) sells for less than raw, so anything short of a 10 loses money.
How much is a PSA 10 Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 (Baseball Cards 2022 Bowman's Best UFO) sells for about $160 versus $56.32 for a raw near-mint copy — a 2.8× premium as of Sep 4, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $208, ahead of PSA 10 at $160. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
What gem rate makes grading Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 break even?
At a standard ~$50 fee, submitting Julio Rodriguez [Atomic] #UFO-4 breaks even when it gems about 59% of the time (a miss assumed to sell at the PSA 9 price of $30.00).
Best on iPhone & Android
Check your baseball card in the Midpoint app
Scan with your camera to measure centering to the millimeter, get an AI grade with corner and edge close-ups, see what your copy is worth, and track it in your portfolio. Free to start.
