![Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 (Hockey Cards 2015 SP Authentic) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/NNUAAOSwLvRmOS-b/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 worth grading?
Hockey · Hockey Cards 2015 SP Authentic · full price guide →
Worth grading — even a PSA 9 beats raw
A PSA 10 Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 sells for $425 against $188 raw: a $237 spread, 2.3× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($256) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $188
- PSA 10
- $425
- PSA 9
- $256
- Gem premium
- 2.3×
- As of
- Jul 11, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $425 | +$212 | +$187 | +$86.72 |
| PSA 9 | $256 | +$42.72 | +$17.72 | −$82.28 |
| PSA 8 | $233 | +$19.40 | −$5.60 | −$106 |
Net = sale price − $188 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $298 | +$59.97 |
| 50% | $341 | +$102 |
| 75% | $383 | +$144 |
Even a miss (a 9) beats selling raw after the standard fee — the gem rate only decides how much you win by.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $553 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $425 | −$128 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $255 | −$298 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $252 | −$301 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →| Grade | PSA | CGC | BGS | SGC | Graded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $425 | $255 | $553 | $252 | — |
| 9.5 | — | — | — | — | $282 |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | $256 |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | $233 |
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 2015 SP Authentic cards worth checking
Full set checklist →Grading Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 — FAQ
Is Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 sells for $425 against $188 raw: a $237 spread, 2.3× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($256) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 (Hockey Cards 2015 SP Authentic) sells for about $425 versus $188 for a raw near-mint copy — a 2.3× premium as of Jul 11, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $553, ahead of PSA 10 at $425. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Artemi Panarin [Autograph] #258 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
Is your hockey card centered well enough to grade?
Centering makes or breaks a PSA 10. Scan any card with Midpoint to measure its exact centering, get a grade estimate, and see what your copy is actually worth.
Check my card free![Jack Eichel [Autograph] #191 2015 SP Authentic card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3ncAAeSw6tJqO-UT/s-l500.jpg)
![Connor McDavid [Autograph] #226 2015 SP Authentic card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/zYwAAeSwQIpp98cn/s-l500.jpg)
![Artemi Panarin [Limited Autograph Patch] #258 2015 SP Authentic card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/DMQAAOSwaWpjM0Rt/s-l500.jpg)