![Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 (Baseball Cards 1963 Topps) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/EPsAAeSwrj5ql3Xn/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 worth grading?
Baseball · Baseball Cards 1963 Topps · full price guide →
Worth grading — even a PSA 9 beats raw
A PSA 10 Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 sells for $679 against $3.84 raw: a $675 spread, 177× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($600) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $3.84
- PSA 10
- $679
- PSA 9
- $600
- Gem premium
- 177×
- As of
- Sep 4, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $679 | +$650 | +$625 | +$525 |
| PSA 9 | $600 | +$571 | +$546 | +$446 |
| PSA 8 | $72.00 | +$43.16 | +$18.16 | −$81.84 |
Net = sale price − $3.84 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $620 | +$566 |
| 50% | $639 | +$585 |
| 75% | $659 | +$605 |
Even a miss (a 9) beats selling raw after the standard fee — the gem rate only decides how much you win by.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $882 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $679 | −$204 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $407 | −$475 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $407 | −$475 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →Swipe the table for the other grading companies →
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 1963 Topps cards worth checking
Full set checklist →
Grading Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 — FAQ
Is Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 sells for $679 against $3.84 raw: a $675 spread, 177× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($600) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 (Baseball Cards 1963 Topps) sells for about $679 versus $3.84 for a raw near-mint copy — a 177× premium as of Sep 4, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $882, ahead of PSA 10 at $679. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Nelson Mathews / Harry Fanok / Dave DeBusschere / Jack Cullen [1962 Front and Back] #54 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
Best on iPhone & Android
Check your baseball card in the Midpoint app
Scan with your camera to measure centering to the millimeter, get an AI grade with corner and edge close-ups, see what your copy is worth, and track it in your portfolio. Free to start.
