![Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 (Basketball Cards 2002 Topps Pristine) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/0tcAAOSw18pjn60p/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 worth grading?
Basketball · Basketball Cards 2002 Topps Pristine · full price guide →
Strong grading candidate — 7.6× premium in PSA 10
A PSA 10 Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 sells for $1,761 against $233 raw: a $1,528 spread, 7.6× the ungraded price. A PSA 9 ($231) sells for less than raw, so anything short of a 10 loses money. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $233
- PSA 10
- $1,761
- PSA 9
- $231
- Gem premium
- 7.6×
- As of
- Jul 11, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $1,761 | +$1,503 | +$1,478 | +$1,378 |
| PSA 9 | $231 | −$26.66 | −$51.66 | −$152 |
Net = sale price − $233 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $613 | +$331 |
| 50% | $996 | +$713 |
| 75% | $1,378 | +$1,096 |
Break-even gem rate at the standard fee: about 3%. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses — measure it before you decide.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $2,289 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $1,761 | −$528 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $1,056 | −$1,233 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $1,056 | −$1,233 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →| Grade | PSA | CGC | BGS | SGC | Graded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,761 | $1,056 | $2,289 | $1,056 | — |
| 9.5 | — | — | — | — | $273 |
| 9 | — | — | — | — | $231 |
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 2002 Topps Pristine cards worth checking
Full set checklist →Grading Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 — FAQ
Is Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 sells for $1,761 against $233 raw: a $1,528 spread, 7.6× the ungraded price. A PSA 9 ($231) sells for less than raw, so anything short of a 10 loses money. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 (Basketball Cards 2002 Topps Pristine) sells for about $1,761 versus $233 for a raw near-mint copy — a 7.6× premium as of Jul 11, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Yao Ming [Refractor] #53?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $2,289, ahead of PSA 10 at $1,761. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
What gem rate makes grading Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 break even?
At a standard ~$50 fee, submitting Yao Ming [Refractor] #53 breaks even when it gems about 3% of the time (a miss assumed to sell at the PSA 9 price of $231).
Is your basketball card centered well enough to grade?
Centering makes or breaks a PSA 10. Scan any card with Midpoint to measure its exact centering, get a grade estimate, and see what your copy is actually worth.
Check my card free


![Michael Jordan [Gold Refractor] #4 2002 Topps Pristine card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/tx0AAOSwD3dem4Wf/s-l500.jpg)
![Yao Ming [Gold Refractor] #51 2002 Topps Pristine card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/NzcAAOSw2Elnt7QR/s-l500.jpg)