![Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 (Baseball Cards 2026 Topps Chrome Perspectives) — is it worth grading?](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/ua4AAeSwMwFqfhIG/s-l1600.jpg)
Is Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 worth grading?
Baseball · Baseball Cards 2026 Topps Chrome Perspectives · full price guide →
Worth grading — even a PSA 9 beats raw
A PSA 10 Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 sells for $142 against $20.29 raw: a $122 spread, 7.0× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($48.04) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
- Raw (NM)
- $20.29
- PSA 10
- $142
- PSA 9
- $48.04
- Gem premium
- 7.0×
- As of
- Sep 4, 2026
Break-even by outcome and fee
| If it comes back… | Sells for | Economy / bulk (~$25.00) | Standard (~$50.00) | Express (~$150) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gem — PSA 10 | $142 | +$97.02 | +$72.02 | −$27.98 |
| PSA 9 | $48.04 | +$2.75 | −$22.25 | −$122 |
| PSA 8 | $26.64 | −$18.65 | −$43.65 | −$144 |
Net = sale price − $20.29 raw value − fee. Fee tiers are illustrative; plug your grader's current price into the calculator below.
Expected value — how often does it need to gem?
| Chance it gems | Expected sale | Expected net (standard fee) |
|---|---|---|
| 25% | $71.61 | +$1.32 |
| 50% | $95.17 | +$24.88 |
| 75% | $119 | +$48.45 |
Break-even gem rate at the standard fee: about 24%. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses — measure it before you decide.
Which grader pays the most — and what a 10 takes
All centering standards →| Grader | 10 sells for | vs best | Front centering for a 10 | Back |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS 10 | $185 | best | 55/45 | 70/30 |
| PSA 10 | $142 | −$42.69 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| CGC 10 | $85.00 | −$100 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
| SGC 10 | $85.00 | −$100 | 55/45 | 75/25 |
Tolerances are each company's published centering standard for its top grade; surface, corners and edges must also be clean. Centering is the one you can measure yourself before you pay.
Full grade ladder
Raw conditions & history →Swipe the table for the other grading companies →
Run your own numbers
Should I pay this?
Enter the seller’s asking price to see your net outcome per grade.
Other 2026 Topps Chrome Perspectives cards worth checking
Full set checklist →Grading Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 — FAQ
Is Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 worth grading?
A PSA 10 Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 sells for $142 against $20.29 raw: a $122 spread, 7.0× the ungraded price. Even a PSA 9 ($48.04) clears the raw price after an economy-tier ~$25 fee, so a near-miss still comes out ahead. Centering is the usual reason a clean copy misses the 10 — measure it before you submit.
How much is a PSA 10 Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 worth compared with raw?
A PSA 10 Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 (Baseball Cards 2026 Topps Chrome Perspectives) sells for about $142 versus $20.29 for a raw near-mint copy — a 7.0× premium as of Sep 4, 2026.
Which grading company is best for Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1?
By resale value, BGS 10 leads at $185, ahead of PSA 10 at $142. Fees and turnaround differ, so the best-paying label is not always the best net.
What centering does Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 need for a BGS 10?
BGS publishes 55/45 front and 70/30 back centering as the tolerance for a 10 (Gem Mint). Off-center copies are capped below the top grade regardless of surface — measure yours before paying the fee.
What gem rate makes grading Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 break even?
At a standard ~$50 fee, submitting Jac Caglianone [Geometric] #P-1 breaks even when it gems about 24% of the time (a miss assumed to sell at the PSA 9 price of $48.04).
Best on iPhone & Android
Check your baseball card in the Midpoint app
Scan with your camera to measure centering to the millimeter, get an AI grade with corner and edge close-ups, see what your copy is worth, and track it in your portfolio. Free to start.
![Jac Caglianone [Gold] #P-1 2026 Topps Chrome Perspectives card](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/33oAAeSwi1JqclUs/s-l500.jpg)